home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.worldlinx.com!stupy
- From: stupy@freenet.durham.org (Steve Tupy)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Problem with memory allocation in BC 4.5
- Followup-To: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Date: 5 Jan 1996 06:10:15 GMT
- Organization: Durham Free-Net
- Message-ID: <4cifc7$ii5@news.worldlinx.com>
- References: <4bqdn4$jjm@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> <26DEC199522264203@erich.triumf.ca> <4brp36$dd4@cloner2.ix.netcom.com> <820188116snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet.durham.org
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Lawrence Kirby (fred@genesis.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- : In article <4brp36$dd4@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
- : joao_raf@ix.netcom.com(Joao "Joao Rafael Moraes Nicola " writes:
-
- : Whether that is true or not it is always sensible to use the conceptually
- : related functions. This can avoid problems and confusion later on.
-
- Except when you are in a larger model, all calls to free are
- automatically setup as far.
-
- --
- Steve
-